Logo Contest Rules: the Checklist Before Entries Open
Logo contest rules must state who is eligible, that entering carries no purchase requirement in a United States sweepstakes, how winners are selected, and how they are notified. The Federal Trade Commission's advertising guidance sets the no-purchase position, and Competition Bureau Canada requires disclosure of prizes, odds and selection by skill or chance.
By BuyVotesForContest editorial desk ยท Updated
What official rules must contain
Four items sit at the core of every set of logo contest rules, and regulators have written the model language for each. Eligibility comes first: the organiser lists who is excluded from entering, and the exclusions stand even for people who meet the open criteria. Second, the cost of entry. Third, how the winner is chosen. Fourth, what the winner receives and when. A brief missing any of the four is the clearest early signal that the project was assembled in a hurry.
- Eligibility: who is excluded, in a named list that survives a challenge.
- The entry terms: what the no-purchase position is, and whether proof of payment is barred.
- Judging: who assesses the work and against which stated criteria.
- Prizes: the approximate value and the number of awards, disclosed up front.
- Notification: how and when the organiser contacts a winner, and what silence costs.
Eligibility clauses that end an entry
The eligibility block does its work in one sentence, but it is the sentence disputes turn on. The Federal Trade Commission's model language lists individuals who are not eligible regardless of whether they meet the criteria set out above, which is how a well-built brief closes the gap between who seems allowed and who is. For a judged design contest the same block carries the skill standard: a contestant's likelihood of winning depends on the number and quality of submissions, assessed by judges against the published criteria. Where no such standard is stated, no one outside the organiser knows what a win meant.
- Employees of the organiser and their households, named rather than implied.
- Residents of jurisdictions where the promotion is barred by local law.
- Minors, unless a parent or guardian signs the consent block the brief supplies.
- Previous winners inside a waiting period, if the organiser sets one.
Entry cost, where the law draws lines
The cost line is where copycat briefs fail. In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission's small-business advertising guidance holds that sweepstakes promotions requiring a purchase are illegal, so a legitimate no-purchase route must exist and be stated. Florida goes further for covered game promotions and bars an entry fee, payment or proof of purchase as a condition of entering. Competition Bureau Canada takes the opposite position on paper: the Competition Act does not forbid requiring a purchase to enter, and the Bureau asks organisers to disclose such a requirement prominently. The same Bureau guidance adds two disclosure duties that apply either way, the approximate value and number of prizes, and selection of participants or distribution of prizes on the basis of skill or at random.
- United States sweepstakes law: a required purchase makes the promotion illegal.
- Florida: no entry fee, payment or proof of purchase in a covered game promotion.
- Canada: a purchase requirement is permitted and must be prominently disclosed.
- A judged contest with no chance element is a different legal animal; the rules still state the terms.
Judging and the finalist cut
A judged design contest lives or dies on the criteria paragraph. Judges score submissions against what the brief published, and the Federal Trade Commission's model language says exactly that: the likelihood of winning depends on the number and quality of submissions as determined by the judges using the criteria in the official rules. When a public vote sits behind the jury, the brief must say which stage the vote decides and which it does not. Canadian guidance folds the same duty into disclosure, since organisers must state facts within their knowledge that materially affect the chances of winning.
- The criteria, published before entries open, not after the shortlist.
- The number of finalists and the date they are named.
- Whether a public vote sits between the shortlist and the final decision.
- Tie-breaking, in one sentence, even if the answer is a coin toss by the jury.
T shirt design contest rules and guidelines
Guidelines for a shirt brief add production limits that a pure logo brief never carries, because the artwork has to survive a press. A t shirt design contest rules page therefore reads differently from a standard logo brief: it names colour counts, placement zones and file resolution before anything else, and it states whether the printed garment may differ from the submitted file. Read those limits before sketching, since a strong concept printed outside the placement zone still loses. The rest of the brief, eligibility, judging and notification, matches the standard logo structure described above.
- Colour count: how many inks the print run allows per garment.
- Placement: which areas of the shirt the artwork may cover.
- Resolution and file format for the submitted design files.
- Whether a mockup on a model photograph is required alongside flat artwork.
- How the printed result may differ from the on-screen submission.
Revisions, variations and new concepts
Revision language causes more disputes than prize language, so write it tightly. Organisers mean one of two things by a change: a variation of the selected direction, or a wholly new concept, and the guidelines must say which one a revision round covers. When the brief counts entries rather than rounds, a designer who submits five concepts has spent the allowance even if only one direction survives. The fix costs one sentence in the rules and prevents every argument that follows.
- A variation reworks the chosen direction: colour, type, or the symbol itself.
- A concept is a separate idea, and the brief counts it as its own entry.
- Rounds are numbered, and unused rounds rarely carry over.
- The handover list states exactly which files the transfer covers.
Copyright and the written transfer
Ownership of a logo moves by writing, not by winning. Until the transfer document is signed, the designer holds the rights, and an organiser that prints the winning artwork first has acted without a licence. Sound logo contest rules name the transfer moment, list the files it covers, and state what rights the organiser holds in non-winning entries, which is the clause entrants forget to read and later regret.
- The moment ownership moves, named by date or by event.
- The files the transfer covers, including source files.
- What the organiser may do with the entry before the transfer completes.
- Whether the designer keeps a portfolio right to show the work.
Removing a published project from search
A project that must disappear needs two actions, and neither is optional. First the platform hosting the contest entry is asked to take the project page down; that removes the source. Then the search engine's removal tools are used for results already indexed, because a cache outlives the page it copied. Organisers running their own contest site follow the same order for any entry they must withdraw, and the published rules should name who decides and how long it takes.
- Request unpublishing from the contest platform first.
- File the search engine's own removal request for indexed copies.
- Allow re-crawling time; removal is not instant on either side.
| Element | What to write |
|---|---|
| Eligibility | Who is excluded, named in a list, including households and restricted jurisdictions |
| Entry cost | No purchase required in a United States sweepstakes; no entry fee or proof of purchase in a covered Florida promotion |
| Judging | Judges score against published criteria; odds depend on the number and quality of submissions |
| Notification | How and when the organiser contacts a winner, and what happens on silence |
| Prizes | The approximate value and the number of prizes, disclosed before entries open |
| Rights and revisions | When ownership moves, which files it covers, and what counts as a variation |
Step by step
-
Read the rules before the artwork
Open the official rules first and check the four core items: eligibility, the cost of entering, the judging method, and the prize terms. Ten minutes here decides whether the project is worth a single submitted design.
-
Confirm the entry terms
Verify the no-purchase language for the jurisdiction, and that the brief states how winners are selected and notified. If a required payment sits where a free route should be, the organiser has a legal problem before it has a design problem.
-
Mark the dates in the brief
Write down the entry deadline, the finalist selection date, and the revision window. Each one is a clock the organiser runs without reminders, and a missed date hands the slot to the next-ranked entry.
-
Fix the rights in writing
Check that the transfer clause names the moment ownership moves and the files it covers. Sign nothing that leaves the copyright question open, and keep a copy of the signed agreement with the delivered artwork.
Questions
How many entries will I receive?
The guidelines fix the number before the project opens. Most logo projects bundle a set of submissions at one length, so the count is written in the brief rather than assumed. Read that line first, because it decides how much material a single project puts in front of the jury.
When to select my finalist?
The date sits in the brief, tied to the close of entries. A judged logo project names a selection window after submissions close; a public-vote contest names the moment the standings freeze. Miss the window and the organiser is free to promote the next-ranked entry under its own terms.
How does logo revision work?
Revision runs in rounds against the chosen direction. The organiser marks what to change, the designer delivers edited files inside the stated round length, and the count of rounds is fixed in the brief. Each round adjusts the selected work; it does not reopen the whole field.
Can I still make changes?
Yes, inside the revision window the brief allows. After the winner is confirmed and files are handed over, changes need a new written agreement with the designer, and the transfer terms decide who signs off on them. Organisers rarely edit a handed-over project for free.
What about logo copyright?
A written transfer settles it. Until the assignment is signed, the designer holds the rights to the artwork, so official rules should name the moment ownership moves, which files it covers, and what the organiser may use before that moment. Without that clause the platform hosts the entry but owns none of it.
How to remove my project from Google search?
Work in two places. Ask the contest platform to unpublish the project, then use the search engine's own removal request tools for pages it has already indexed. Deletion on the platform alone does not clear a cached result, and neither step removes copies other sites saved.
What is a variation versus a new concept?
A variation adjusts the chosen direction; a concept is a separate route. Recolouring, reworking the symbol, or changing the type on the selected design counts as a variation. A submission built on a different idea, even from the same designer, is a new concept and often a separate entry under the guidelines.
Are logo contests with entry fees legitimate?
Read the payment line before anything else. The Federal Trade Commission's guidance treats a required purchase in a sweepstakes-style United States promotion as illegal, and Florida law bars an entry fee in a covered game promotion, so an organiser demanding payment to enter faces real legal limits.
Sources
- ftc.gov. ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/advertising-faqs-guide-small-business.
- leg.state.fl.us. leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm.
- competition-bureau.canada.ca. competition-bureau.canada.ca/en/deceptive-marketing-practices/types-deceptive-marketing-practices/promotional-contests.
- competition-bureau.canada.ca. competition-bureau.canada.ca/en/deceptive-marketing-practices/types-deceptive-marketing-practices/promotional-contests.
- competition-bureau.canada.ca. competition-bureau.canada.ca/en/deceptive-marketing-practices/types-deceptive-marketing-practices/promotional-contests.
This page carries no entry fee, no prize pool and no service prices, and it quotes no organiser's brief beyond the published guidance it cites. It does not teach anyone to vote more than once, to run automated entries, or to hide where a submission came from. It names no vote seller and makes no promise of a win.
A contest vote sits under two rulebooks, the platform's and the organiser's. On CuteBaby, voters get ten free daily votes that expire at midnight, and an account needs a South African mobile number. Organisers then enforce their own terms: Darley may disqualify and replace a potential winner who does not follow its rules, and the Queen's Commonwealth Writing Competition disqualifies over-length entries automatically. An order for contest votes changes none of that.
Contest voting has a rhythm of its own. The Arizona State Fair includes live audience voting on every qualifying night, and the Ernie Ball contest measures online activity throughout its contest period. A count that builds across the window, from separate voters, matches that rhythm. None of this is a method for passing an organiser's checks, and an organiser can still disqualify an entry it doubts.
In the United States, the FTC says a real sweepstakes is free and decided by chance, and that a skills contest can ask you to pay to play. Canada's Competition Bureau says a purchase requirement should be prominently disclosed. Those rules govern entry to a sweepstakes or promotion, and whether paying for votes in a contest is lawful where you live is a question for a lawyer. No order is taken for a sweepstakes or other chance draw, for a political ballot, or for a contest whose rules bar outside votes.
The part of an order that never reaches the contest's own count is refunded once the organiser's voting has closed. America's Favorite Pet calls its dates approximate and lets its operator extend deadlines, so that moment is the organiser's to set. A result, a disqualification and a voided vote are never refunded. At IODC, public votes and engagement do not by themselves decide the winners, and no refund changes how a contest weighs them.